The best software is the software you're fastest in when the clock is on, deadlines are looming. I had no choice really, having done so many commercial one-day sessions over the years. I like to jump into my chair, and work as fast as possible. I am using it because I started using it like 15 years ago. Just my thoughts on the matter, I'm sure others will have valuable input :) If enough people do that, we'll see a switch. If someone starts out in their bedroom and progresses to the big leagues, they might just love their own DAW enough to keep on it and not worry about using Pro Tools. Bedroom producers are more numerous than ever, and the majority aren't working on Pro Tools theyre on Logic, Albeton, FL etc. You've got to look at the way people create music now though. I might be way off the mark, perhaps Pro Tools will always be at the forefront. Macs are here to stay in creative industries, I think Logic will also stick around and the ability to do audio and MIDI in the way it does will be more important for people than the ability to use software (Pro Tools) that used to be the best in town. FL and Ableton are very production centred, Reaper and Studio One don't have the same push behind them to compete, and for some reason Cubase always gets left out of discussions about the best DAWs around. In my opinion, given maybe 20 years Pro Tools will start to have less of a market share and we'll probably see more of a turn towards something like Logic Pro. Regardless of whether or not it's the best, there are still a hell of a lot of engineers who use it every day and you won't get them to change just like there are a lot who use hardware and won't change to 100% DAW. In reality it could essentially do the same as other DAWs, it was just being helped by the proprietary hardware.įrom there it's just a case of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" The name "Pro Tools" becomes synonymous with "Recording Studio" so people will always make the connection that Pro Tools is the #1 in software for studios. This meant that it was offloading a lot of the processing from the computer to the card, so it seemd like it could do more. Pro Tools was the first DAW that allowed you to do things such as monitor in real time, record x amount of tracks simulataneously, and a host of other things, because they sold the hardware cards that slotted into the studio's computer. I have enjoyed seeing the feedback from everyone!įirst of all, it's not the sound, they all sound the same, this has been proven numerous times. I’m simply posing the question as to why people are still using it over much cheaper alternatives that perform relatively the same tasks. I’d like to reiterate that this is not a bash on pro tools. If im using all the same plugins and all the same audio files im thinking everything should sound the same.but im happy to admit being wrong. I think there is something to be said about all DAW's having a different sound, but I attest that to beeing the way their stock plugins/synths sound. I struggle to believe that one software just sounds better than another. If there are other reasons to justify the cost and effort to keep using it at a professional level I would love to know them. Im honestly curious if it just comes down to workflow and it being the industry standard that keeps people loyal? Im really not trying to hate on pro tools, its amazing software and I still use Pro Tools 11 on a regular basis for editing and exporting files so that I can mix in Logic x.īut with software like Logic X that pale in comparison cost wise and can do nearly everything that pro tools can, and without the headache of trying to deal with Avid and their subscription plans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |